David
Prior: You reminded me of something. Back when I was
probably about seven or eight years old, and just starting to figure
out my sensibilities - looking at movies on television - I knew that
movies were different in the theater, but I didn't know why. And I
used to wonder how they got that strange kind of pan
[everyone
laughs]
Bill Hunt: Yeah, and your eye
always went right to it, and you knew something wasn't quite right
Todd Doogan: Columbia was
worst about that
David Prior: And, yeah - it's
dead still, and then it was like, zzzzzzzzz
and the camera
moves over
Bill Hunt: And your mind
always supplied the motor sound.
David Prior: [laughs] There
were times when it worked in a bizarre way, not because it was
better, but just because it lent itself to the scene in an odd way.
And I used to think it was part of the way it was shot, and should I
try to replicate that or not? Then of course when I figured out what
it was, I threw all that out the window.
Todd Doogan: But some people
didn't. So these filmmakers would say, "I got it from this
movie", and all you can say is, "No you didn't - you got
it from the panned and scanned version. You didn't get it from the
movie, you got it from some video technician named Carl, sitting
there in a room doing the film transfer." [more laughter]
David Prior: Which is why you
look at movies now, and you'll still see that influence. You'll see
these close-ups crawling up people's noses, for no dramatic reason
whatsoever. Not because these people don't understand anything about
frame size, but just because they watch too much television.
Bill Hunt: And now there are a
few directors out there who just don't appreciate the wide screen.
There's sort of two schools - some who've gotta have that "scope"
look to their movies, because they grew up looking at movies like
Lawrence of Arabia in
widescreen on laserdisc, and then there are all these guys who were
videophiles, who think in terms of television. And when they put
their movies on video or DVD, they even to this day say, "You
know, I want it to fill the screen
"
David Prior: Like James
Cameron.
Bill Hunt: Sure.
Todd Doogan: Well, it's gotta
be hard to compose a frame like that, for a video safe area. You
probably in your mind think that you can, but then you get on set,
and think, "How the hell am I gonna do this?" And then you
start shooting everything in the center of the frame.
David Prior: It takes an
aesthetic discipline. Max Ophüls, who directed Lola
Montès, struggled with it for a long, long time.
And he one day went up to Peter Ustinov in the middle of shooting,
and he said, "I think I've cracked it." And he came up
with this "rule of threes". Now I don't know that he
invented it, and I'm sure anybody who had worked in widescreen
before had stumbled across it, but he found it on his own - which
was using middleground, foreground and background, always within the
frame. Of course, that doesn't work for a close-up, but just
adopting a kind of ancient Greek ideal of what is aesthetically
pleasing, it becomes a lot easier.
Bill Hunt: I know William
Friedkin is another director who thinks in terms of TV - I spoke
with him briefly at a signing for The
Exorcist DVD, and he originally wanted that to be full
frame when it came on DVD. And Warner really had to push him to do
widescreen.
David Prior: That explains the
Sorcerer laserdisc. I haven't
seen the DVD, but the laserdisc was full frame.
Todd Doogan: So what kind of
aesthetic do you bring as a filmmaker to DVD production? I'm sure
you have to have a knowledge of both film history, and what people
want to see in order to so a successful DVD like Ravenous.
David Prior: Well, I think
that it boils down to the same thing that applies whenever you're
doing anything creative. I'm pretentious enough to consider myself
an artist, not necessarily in the realm of DVD - there I'm just
trying to represent someone else's work. But I just try to do what I
want to see, and hope that there are other people out there who will
be as interested as I am.
Bill Hunt: As an artist,
representing someone else's art as you just said, is there a certain
amount of respect involved? I mean, obviously you love the film, and
have a certain amount of reverence for it
David Prior: Absolutely. It's
all got to be about the work. The film has to take top priority.
Which is why, when I was really tearing my hair out about the
supplements on Ravenous, I had
to stop and remind myself that the real focus here is the film. But
apart from just trying to create some sense of unity, the
supplements and whatever added-value stuff you're putting together
has to sort of fall in line with the aesthetic of the film in some
way. And it's important to try and understand the film -
fortunately, so far I've been dealing with films that are about
something. So the farther you dive into the themes and the meanings,
there are little sign posts that help you to understand how to
execute some of the supplements. I mean, if you're doing Fraternity
Vacation, it's a little easier to dive in
Todd Doogan: I like that
movie. [everyone laughs]
David Prior: It's a likable
movie. And there are all kinds of movies that I like that would fall
into that category. But they're easier to grab onto. And even more
complicated films, as you really start digging into them - as good
artists, directors sort of leave you a trail of bread crumbs to
follow. And as soon as you find that, you can get a better idea of
what approach is best when you're working on the DVD.
Todd Doogan: Can you do that
same thing, apply that artistic sensibility, to something you're not
as passionate about?
David Prior: Yeah. That's
where discipline comes in. And I'm - I'm the latest riser I can
think of, and I have virtually no discipline. But I think, when it
comes to my work, I'm very disciplined. Because it's more than just
a passion for the individual title, it's a passion for the medium,
and the whole nine yards with movies.
Bill Hunt: Getting back to
something we talked about earlier - the artists' involvement - what
did Antonia and some of the others think of the disc when they saw
it?
David Prior: Actually they
haven't seen it, because it hasn't come out in Region 2 yet.
Bill Hunt: So they haven't
seen anything you've done yet?
David Prior: The people in
England haven't yet. I don't even know that they know it's out yet.
I've been meaning to send Antonia an e-mail to tell her about it,
and hopefully, she'll come to the States soon, and I'll be able to
show it to her. Ted Griffin has been very pleased. He called me very
excited on the day it came out - he went into Virgin and saw it on
the shelf, and said he was very proud of it, and that made me feel
great. He's such a talented writer and so uncommonly fearless about
taking on risky material early in his career. His reaction made me
very proud.
Todd Doogan: With some of the
stuff that you said you had wanted to with Ravenous,
but weren't able to - more of a look at the history behind the
story, and just more comprehensive extras
are you going to be
able to do that more now, now that Ravenous
has been a success?
David Prior: I don't know, but
I'll continue to try. I think that the battles hopefully get fewer
and a little easier to win as you go on. As I said before, Fox is
terrific to work with now. They got off to kind of a rocky start,
but everyone there that's involved in the day-to-day work on DVD is
very much behind the format. They're very interested in doing added
value material. And I think you're gonna start seeing some really
great stuff coming from them. I know they're much more favorable
towards 16x9 now
Bill Hunt: That's something
that our readers talk to us about all the time.
David Prior: Yeah. I can
understand why they [Fox] were a little reticent about 16x9 early
on, because the first couple of generations of players - there was a
noticeable degradation of the image in 16x9 on a regular TV. And the
simple truth is that nine-tenths of the population still has 4x3
TVs.
Bill Hunt: That quality
argument is the same thing we heard from Criterion, and THX and some
others. But now that the technology has developed, that problem has
solved itself, and they're all realizing the benefits of anamorphic.
David Prior: Right - it was
the early players and not the software. And now Fox has decided that
since the players are no longer a problem, they're going ahead.
Todd Doogan: Speaking of
Criterion, do you personally think - because I do - that every
single DVD special edition that comes out should have a thank you to
Criterion for pioneering the idea
[everyone laughs]
David Prior: I think it should
be on the cover of every box. If it wasn't for them - I actually
find it hard to believe that time is passing so fast. It surprises
me that it was so long ago, that Criterion was the only game in
town, doing these amazing discs, and I felt like I was a market of
one. I'm personally thankful to them for doing all that work. And
now, it's like every studio is doing them.
Bill Hunt: Well, I think
that's the difference with DVD. I mean, laserdisc was a great
format, but it was so inaccessible to a lot of people. Whether it
was the size of the disc, or the side-flipping, or the cost - you
can get into DVD now, just two years into the format, for a lot
cheaper than you could buy into laserdisc for a long time.
David Prior: I think it's the
timing too. I don't think a lot of people were ready for
laserdisc-type technology until CDs hit. And then when that crested,
DVD was inevitable, and already on the way. Laserdisc just didn't
have a chance. Because when it first came out, it was at the same
time as VHS, and your average home consumer was like, "Well, I
can record on one, and I can't on the other
"
Todd Doogan: But some people
still have that complaint about DVD. They're like, "Well, can I
record on it yet?" And you say, "Well, that's what you
have a VCR for." I mean, CDs and cassette tapes co-existed just
fine for a long time. They still do.
Bill Hunt: But I think fewer
people are having that complaint these days, because of just exactly
the things you were talking about a moment ago - DVD sort of
piggybacks on CD. DVD discs even look almost exactly like CDs, even
though they're very different formats. People are used to that
shinny five-inch disc, and they know how to handle them, and stack
them on their shelves. It's friendlier to them.
David Prior: Exactly. I think
- you know, a lot of people use "digital" as a catch word
for quality, and it's not. It's just another way to record
information. And I think that maybe we threw over laserdisc a little
too quickly. Because there are still things about laser that are
superior - just using uncompressed video, for example. And DVD is
getting there definitely - I've seen some very impressive looking
DVDs lately. Personally, I think Ravenous
looks terrific. But there's still quite a few DVDs that look bad.
When high-def DVD comes in - if it comes in - people are talking
about what the uses are for it. I hear things like "even more
supplements," or "five movies on one disc." And I'm
saying, "No... how about one movie, with uncompressed video."
Something about compression - just the notion of it - really bothers
me. But I'm an anal-retentive purist.
Bill Hunt: Well, sure. I mean,
what with MPEG-2 compression on DVD, you're losing like eighty
percent of the original information?
David Prior: It depends, but
something like that, yeah.
Bill Hunt: So getting back to
your work on the extras for Ravenous,
tell us about your experience with the director and actors while
recording the commentary tracks. Was it hard to get them talking
about their work, or did they have plenty to say?
David Prior: Well, the irony
is that the troubles I encountered in making the disc were a light
easterly breeze compared to what they went through making the film,
so there was some reticence about getting too into that on their
part. But, in the end, it was pretty easy really. I mean, each was
different. Antonia considered doing it with a film historian along
with her, to sort of interview her and ask questions, but it ended
up just being her and Damon Albarn, who co-composed the music - in
the studio. And they sort of worked off of each other. Robert
Carlyle was by himself, and he was very specific in his commentary
to what was going on on-screen. Ted Griffin and Jeffery Jones I just
recorded at Jeffery's house on a portable DAT machine, and I'm
surprised at how well that turned out. I mean, we all just sat
around watching the film for three hours, drinking coffee, smoking
like fiends, and we had a great time. It turned out to be a very
entertaining commentary.
Todd Doogan: I think that
maybe is the best way to record a track like that - in a more
relaxed setting.
Bill Hunt: And I think that
having people - a director and writer for instance - in the same
room together really works on a commentary. One of the best tracks
I've heard is Wolfgang Peterson on the DVD version of Das
Boot, and he's got Jürgen Prochnow with him, and the
producer, and it's a blast to listen to them work off each other.
David Prior: Yeah, I really
think those things make a difference.
Todd Doogan: This is a more
personal question, but you said you were a filmmaker. What kind of
films inspire you?
David Prior: Well, my great
grandparents were silent film stars, so
Todd Doogan: Who were they?
David Prior: John Gilbert was
my great grandfather, who was Greta Garbo's on and offscreen amour.
Todd Doogan: Oh, wow.
David Prior: And Leatrice Joy,
who left the business in the '30s, but she was the star of the
original silent Ten Commandments,
and she did a few C.B. DeMille movies. It's weird... I go back and
try to think about when I got really passionate about movies, and I
just can't remember - it was so early. But I remember the one movie
that made me go and ask my mother how you make movies, was Jaws.
And then of course, Star Wars
cemented it. And I think that, as much as I was the typical
nine-year-old berserk for Star Wars
in '77, the movie that year that pushed me hardest towards
filmmaking was Close Encounters.
Todd Doogan: Damn that
Spielberg.
David Prior: Well, I haven't
exactly been thrilled with anything Spielberg has done in the last
dozen years or so, but I think that he made three perfect movies
back then.
Bill Hunt: There's a sense of
wonder missing.
David Prior: And such craft! I
mean, you look at the difference between Raiders
of the Lost Ark and Jurassic
Park
Todd Doogan: Well, don't you
think that computers and digital effects are kind of killing that?
David Prior: Well, in some
ways
Todd Doogan: And I think that
they're using them wrong. They're no longer using them as a tool,
but as a way to tell the whole story, and you can't do that.
David Prior: Exactly. I mean
the ending of Jurassic Park is
a perfect example of that - just because it's a big, cool CG effect,
doesn't make it a good ending. Like any new technology, I think
opticals and matte work - and real matte paintings, which aren't
being done much anymore - had evolved to a point over the years,
where the gimmickry had started to diminish, and people were just
using them to get their work done. And CG still hasn't gotten to
that point yet - people are still doing it just to do it. To break
new ground. And you look at something like The
Matrix - there are a lot of shots in that movie that
would have been better done using traditional methods, you know,
whatever you say about the film. I worked in special effects for
years, but phased myself out when computers arrived, because I think
they took the fun out of it. I mean, building models and blowing
stuff up, and all that. The unavoidable truth is that there are
definitely some cases where CG is absolutely the best way to go, and
that's when you use it. But it's just being used for everything now.
Todd Doogan: A friend of mine
works in effects, and he tells me that some of the digital effects
shots in Fight Club are just
amazing.
David Prior: Well, I just saw
the film yesterday, and I know exactly what he's talking about -
exactly which shots. And they are very impressive. But they look
digital.
Todd Doogan: They do?
David Prior: There's a patina
of artificiality that CG always has
Todd Doogan: But you were
saying that some filmmakers are using it for everything. Is Fincher
being more traditional with it?
David Prior: I think Fincher
is much too interesting a filmmaker to fall into that trap. He's
using it for things that you really couldn't do any other way.
There's a sequence, for example, where the camera is zooming down
the side of a building, into an underground garage, and then through
the back of a truck, through the front of the truck
and you
just couldn't do that any other way than with digital. And it's
impressive, but it looks digital.
Bill Hunt: I think a lot of it
comes down to business, and what sells. Digital effects bring people
into the theater seats - The Phantom
Menace, for example. And getting back to someone like
Spielberg, I think he's gotten so involved in producer mode, and "running
a studio" mode, that the pure filmmaker in him doesn't get to
come out as much as it used to. And, let's be honest
he
doesn't have the same world view as he did when he was younger, for
better or worse. And that's not so much a criticism, just the
natural evolution in a person over their life. I think that he
himself has even said that Close
Encounters is a movie that he would never be able to make
today. But I'm still not sure how he could make a movie like Jurassic
Park in the same year as he makes Schindler's
List. I don't know how you switch gears like that.
David Prior: I think you're
right about that. And I think that the fact that he had to make do
with much smaller budgets back then - more of a guerrilla filmmaking
style - forced a toughness and more of a creative edge to his work.
Bill Hunt: I think that's why
Saving Private Ryan works so
well when it does - Spielberg sort of just went into the action
combat cameraman-style, and captured moments that he never could
have gotten any other way.
Todd Doogan: He was forced to
be more creative in his direction. Also, there's just no need for
filmmaking budgets to be so unbelievably high.
David Prior: Right. Which is
why I think little movies like Ravenous
have to be supported. Because that was a twelve million dollar
movie, from a major studio. That just doesn't happen much anymore.
The fact that it does occasionally, is I think worth throwing up a
flag about. I think the trend should go back to lower budgets. And I
hope it does. I've heard people saying now, "Nothing over
seventy million!" But even that's too much for most movies. I
hate to be typical, but I really pine for the '70s.
Todd Doogan: It was a really
magical time in filmmaking, wasn't it?
David Prior: Definitely. Every
couple of weeks, you had some kind of interesting new Friedkin or
Scorsese picture to go and see, with really naturalistic acting.
Bill Hunt: Can you imagine a
movie like The Conversation
being made today? It would never happen.
David Prior: Well, it did
and it was called Enemy of the State.
[a big laugh all around]
Bill Hunt: Exactly. You're
absolutely right. That really sums up the differences in filmmaking
from the '70s to the '90s perfectly, right there. So is there
anything else you'd like readers of The
Digital Bits to know about the Ravenous
DVD, or your work in general, before we wrap up?
David Prior: Well, I guess, to
sum this all up, my reasons for doing Ravenous
were selfish. I loved the movie, and I really wanted it done right
on DVD. But beyond that, I hope that when you go into the store, and
you're browsing through the DVDs, and you pick it up, and you go, "What
the hell is this?", you'll see all the extras on it, and see
that someone put some time into it, and think that maybe it's worth
taking a look at. And you'll discover a great little gem.
Bill Hunt: David, thanks for
taking so much of your time to talk with us. This has really been
fun.
Todd Doogan: Yeah - really,
this has been great. It's nice to talk to someone doing DVD that
actually loves film as much as Bill and I do.
David Prior: Believe me, the
fact that you guys care about film and DVD, and understand it, makes
it real easy to talk about the work I'm doing. I mean, I talk with
people all the time who just don't get it, or just don't care. It's
like a breath of fresh air talking with you guys. This has been a
lot of fun.
Bill Hunt: We'll do this again
soon on the Fight Club DVD.
Todd Doogan: Yeah, and we
gotta get a couple of this cool bars of soap.
David Prior: [laughs]
Definitely. Take care, guys. Thanks a lot.
Editor's Note: Be sure to read
our
review of the Ravenous DVD to learn more about it.
Todd and I really think it's a disc that deserves a closer look, if
you haven't seen it yet. And you can be sure that we'll have David
back again very soon, to give you all a sneak peek at the Fight
Club DVD. Based on what he's told us about it, we can
tell you that it should be VERY cool. Hope you all enjoyed the
interview, and thanks again to David for chatting with us. Stay
tuned!
|